Friday, October 24, 2014
Friday, July 25, 2014
While I am cognizant that I have shared this audio feed via other channels and venues, this is consistent with my strategy of leveraging and repurposing existing investments in core assets in order to maximize returns due to my ongoing concerns of diminishing high-level ROI returns and increased liabilities.
We must plan, model, marginalize, strategize, and methodoligize in order to minimize risk while leveraging both our tacit and explicit knowledge. In our efforts to create delightful user experiences and bring the wow effect to a maximized audience by creating delightful user experiences and seamlessness of our superior ecosystem assimilation, we will expand the ease of use and readability of demographic behavioural patterns in order to build our brand while minimizing sub-brand dilution and bringing delightful user experiences to the
Team work is vital so we will break down the silos, build high-performance care teams, and reach across the table in order to innovate, productize, inventilize, ideaate and colorize. We will transition beyond our firefighting mode and uncover hidden gems. Yes, our sentences will run on but we can verbalize both our nouns and adjectives in order to weightify and codify our internal core messages while simultaneously delighting the key customers through relationship building and rapid productization. We must be laser focused on our KSPs, SKUs, ASPs, and most importantly, EVPs.
For those who have actually read this far, needless to say all this will result in significant realignment adjustments to proper size the corporate footprint. Yes, these changes are exciting and exhilarating, but I can imagine to some these lifestyle shifts might seem a bit weird. Have a great day anyway! And ROLL THE TAPE:
Thursday, May 29, 2014
In the developing form-factor cage match between looped and squared, Apple may have chosen to step into the ring with round. At least according to some leaks from the East. I am also putting my money on circular.
It looks like circles are cropping up all over the place now.
"The smart home is just around the corner." Many of us first heard that back in the year 2000. But now we really are about to arrive.
If you're looking for the sizzling hot trend courant, sit back and relax, and don't leave home, because you're soaking in it. No, this stuff never happens overnight. From Microsoft and Samsung to Sony and Cisco, every influential IT and CE vendor worth their popcorn salt had mega stands at all the mega shows, demonstrating their vision of the connected home of the future.
And the future is almost now. Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Google, Samsung, Qualcomm, Cisco, Belkin and many other are getting ready for the beyond-the-PC world. Objects are connected, they learn, the improve, they are really rather smart and helpful.
So, the news this week is full of hints and hot rumors of moves for the living room. Microsoft may be about to rollout a ChromeCast-like device. Apple is preparing a smart-home platform. LG and Samsung are now in the connected light bulb business. (I'll write another post about ReCap's new Smart Bulb report with forecasts to 2019. Thanks for the input on that one.) Let's not forget the service providers: AT&T, Verizon, your local cable guys, your power company, and security firms.
Trends this big require a generation shift to be absorbed. A decade or two to work out the kinks. And a few spec battles just to make things interesting. As is usually the case in new markets, there has been first-mover advantage at home. But now it's looking like it's time to move in for real. Find your place or prepare to be locked out.
Welcome home. Goji Smart Lock.
Tuesday, May 27, 2014
via CNET >>
Perhaps you can forget the Wii when you have the mi. This looks like a great way to get the kids out of the house. Check out this product from Adidas: the miCoach Smart Ball.
Yes, you have the smartphone, smart home, smart watch, smart clothes. And here comes the smart sporting equipment.
In this sensor-filled world of the internet of things, we can count calories, we can count steps, so why shouldn't we be able to count kicks? Adidas's miCouch Smart Ball connects to the user's smartphone via Bluetooth as uses sensors and software to monitor kicks, and includes some games which cross the real world with the virtual one. And for a touch of additional coolness, it uses wireless charging. We'll be seeing a lot more solid uses for wireless charging going forward for sealed gadgets like this.
The miCoach costs around $299/€299 in America/Europe. So, not exactly a toy.
Monday, May 26, 2014
There's nothing like a good form factor battle to get a market going.
I'm not sure if it's just confirmation bias on my part, or the wearables market really is the hottest and most exciting tech trend since the introduction of the white iPhone.
Wearables-related headlines are all over the place, from popular tech blogs to all the major business magazines like Forbes (which often indicates the peak of hype). I'm still an agnostic coward when it comes to predicting the future of these gadgets. I don't see any network effect yet, and I don't know one single person who wears one, even though I know people who work for companies which make these.
Let's face it: the market still needs a poster child. And some killer apps. And, of course, a decisive form factor.
So, Samsung has their square Gear, but Samsung is one company they never met a platform or a form factor they didn't like. No company spreads the risk like Samsung. There is little doubt that Samsung would love to corner the market on smart watches. Don't like square wear? It looks like Samsung is getting ready to make a profound turnaround in smart watches.
Did Samsung just re-invent the circular smart watch?
Friday, May 23, 2014
Predicting consumer tastes is always the hard part. Let's look at the market for smart watches. Though connected watches have been around for more than a decade from vendors such as Sony Ericsson and Polar, they never caught on as mainstream accessories.
If I had been a smart watch designer, I would understand the temptation to create a freeze-dried version of the screens we all know so well: shrink down the familiar smartphone display, turn it sideways, and add a wrist strap.
But given that Google's Android Wear platform and SDK support both round and rectangular watch form factors, I have to wonder which shape will lead the market. While the popular wearables to date such as Samsung's Galaxy Gear and Pebble's Smartwatch are rectangular, I have to say that the retro round-styled watches do look like the could catch on. I've been pretty cynical about a real market for these gadgets in general, but I'm starting to see something here. Please check the videos below for devices from Motorola and a company called Kairos.
So, will the MOTO 360 become the RAZR of the smart watch world or will it be hip to be square? Only time will tell.
Monday, May 19, 2014
Let's compare Norway's adoption of e-cars to its neighboring nation of Sweden. Norway and Sweden are two countries of a similar shape and size. Similar cultures, languages, and tax systems. Two well-off countries with comparable infrastructures and reasonably comparable income levels. Yes, one has oil. But the other has IKEA. Let's call it a wash.
In a new market report Research Capsule is publishing entitled "PEVs, there's no turning back now," ReCap forecasts that while more than 10% of new cars sold in Norway during 2014 will be PEVs, only 0.65% of new cars sold in Sweden will be plug-ins (this includes PHEVs as well as full battery-electrics).
Countries which penalize car buyers with chunky fiscal disincentives to buy and own larger, heavier cars have the opportunity to encourage quick adoption of PEVs by reducing or eliminating those punitive damages. But many countries tax electric cars in essentially the same manner as internal combustion vehicles. Not Norway. Norway has eliminated many of the taxes and registration fees on PEVs, and also has created a great charging infrastructure for electrics. In addition, PEVs can park for free in many places and also use the bus lanes. These incentives have enabled Norway to become the world leader in the adoption of electric cars, and are the reason Tesla chose Norway as one of its first new markets outside of the U.S.
Looking across Norway's border, we see a vastly different market. In Sweden, we estimate less than 1,800 plug-in cars will be sold this year, or less than 0.65% of all new car sales. Any Swedish car buyer who does the math will find that there is no financial incentive to buy electric. Some cynical Swedes we've spoken with say that Sweden won't offer the same level of tax incentives as Norway until semi-Swedish Volvo becomes a real competitor in the PEV market. Why give sales away to Japanese Nissan? It's an interesting thought, though Volvo does have some plug-in hybrids.
Let's call this the Scandinavian Contrast. Norway v Sweden. But soon many of the Norwegian fiscal incentives are set to expire meaning Norway itself will be the perfect Petri dish for observing an e-car culture. In the race to PEV adoption, will Norway's lead be frozen in time?
Norway is in the PEV fast lane:
Drivers of electric cars can use the bus lanes.
Friday, May 16, 2014
From Microsoft's Applied Sciences Group:
The world's largest democracy is taking a leadership position. It's time to look ahead and smile.
(This has always has been one of my favorite commercials. Thanks to the person who shared this.)
The Mini Mi? NO! It's Mi to the MAX. The Mi Pad $240 tablet. I'm telling you, it won't be easy beating Mi, so remember Mi name.
Get to know Mi. And companies like Mi. They are the danger. Good devices, good prices, new pronounceable branding tactics. They have the chemistry in place to change the market for good. Get ready. We are entering the next stage of the wireless business cycle. It's here. It's now. Work with it. Look for opportunities in adjacent markets. Content, services, the connection of things.
So, please do check out the new Xiaomi Mi Pad (Gigaom story), a very decently spec'd up tablet from the Chinese vendor. The Mi Pad has a 7.9-inch screen with 2,048-by-1,536 pixels, runs on an Nvidia Tegra K1 2.2 processor, has 2GB of RAM, an 8-megapixel rear camera, a 5-megapixel front camera, and a microSD slot. All this for $240 for the 16GB version. The tablet will be available in China this summer and I suspect other markets could follow.
Xiaomi (sort of pronounced “show me”) isn't a company looking to scrape some barnacles off of the side of the market. They are aiming for the top. Xiaomi's CEO, Lei Ju, said they “hope to put pressure on Apple.” Xiaomi is a company talking about bringing quality $50 smartphones to the masses. This is a company that is working its way global by spreading out across Asia.
So Apple, Microsoft, Samsung, Sony, others, please do remember Mi name.
No, you haven't heard the last of Mi.
The $240 quality-spec'd Mi tablet. Device prices are coming down, and a receding tide lowers prices for everyone.
Thursday, May 15, 2014
Project Pages >>The market for smart watches won't really take off until someone gets the UI just right. Did these researchers at Carnegie Mellon University just do that? Watch the video:
Wednesday, May 14, 2014
AC/DC. Driving Standards Forward. History might not repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme. Sometimes.
I'm studying the market for plug-in electric vehicles and it sure does remind me of the wireless world of the 1980s. Back then there were air interface specs of all sorts. For those who love standards, there were plenty to choose from. And now with pevs, it's time for more fun.
When it comes to charging plug-in electric vehicles, there's a small learning curve to overcome. You see, there's Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 charging. There are also modes. There's Mode 1, Mode 2, Mode 3, and Mode 4. Mode 4 usually equals Level 3, but it depends on where you are. At times Modes 2 and 3 cover Level 2, but Mode 1 is almost always the same as Level 1, but sometimes Mode 2 is Level 1. But not in France, Japan and parts of the U.S. and some cities in China, depending on what car you drive. And for clarity, there are connection cases. There's Case A, Case B, and Case C. Case B is often Mode 3 which might be Level 2, and C is direct, not alternating you see. And though "Case A" sounds like it's the best case yet, it's actually the worst you can get. (Oh, yea, and before I forget: that case can be 110 or 220, which are actually 120 or 240, again it depends.)
Where do you go to juice up your new e-bucket? Well, there are EVSEs, charging points, charging stations, charging piles, and charging locations. They are all the same, except sometimes they aren't, especially in China. Charging stations are charging locations. Or they might be points or piles or plugs or ports. Pick your poison. You can go to public stations at private locations, or private points at public places. You can pay with points, or you can juice up gratuit. That means free to you and me.
OK, so that's just the semantics of charging. The words. The terms. It's WiFi vs. IEEE 802.11*. It's 4G vs. LTE. It's just like that. But the plug itself offers some more challenging facts. There are connectors and couplers, pistols and cores, and so, so much more.
Ready? You might have an AC-based SAE J1772 charger but could step up to a DC-based unit using the included CHAdeMO cable. (If it's not included, just charge it.) Of course there are proprietary solutions like Tesla's Supercharger. Forget stepping up, there you might want to step down, so get an adapter to use all the slow Level 2's in town.
Well, we all have our types, and so do these cars. There's Type 1 and 2 meaning very different things, there's Type 3 and 4, yes there are plug specs galore.
Then there's AC and DC, and the number of volts. (Tesla developed AC, but Tesla uses DC, somewhat ironically.) There's slow and there's fast, but nothing between. Although there actually is. No it's not easy being green.
Just like the old days of the cellular world, PEV charging has the same mess of specs and terms. There are coverage maps, there are coverage gaps. There's roaming, and dead zones, and specs made of alphabet soup. And there are the early adopters who put up with all this poop.
It's not always easy being green. Why can't these things just use USB?
The industry needs some global standard leadership. And some clever promoter group to boot, to give us nicer terms.
Friday, May 09, 2014
Forget the rose-colored glasses. You're a realist. You see things with clarity and refuse to be deluded by hype. Your colleagues are practically married to their business ideas, but you speak your mind, hurt feelings be damned.
So, in the business world, does it pay to forthright, candid, even blunt to the point of pain? Or is it best to sit down and shut up? It's not easy knowing which is best.
Thursday, May 08, 2014
The Delayed Dozen. Forget the term "technology disruption." In reality hot trends take more than a decade to get noticed.
This is the way trends work. They take more than a decade to work their way through the system. In my experience, 12 years is the average time. All the pieces have to be perfectly in place and, most importantly, consumers have to be ready. The end user is always the unknown variable in the equation. The big X to isolate.
Yes, rolling out new devices and services can be a complex formula. The technology enablers are the easy bits to spot early on. Things are proposed, researched, developed, standardized, funded, and shown at TED -- all before reaching the mainstream media.
So what's the rage now? Why wearables of course. And mobile wellbeing. And life logging. But please check out some of the devices from Polar from more than 10 years ago. PC-connected watches which tracked and collected data on your running and walking distance, pace, altitude, temperature, heart rate. Yes, I'm sorry to break it to you but this smart watch stuff is really nothing new at all. We know Apple has been assembling a high-caliber wearables team since at least 2010. We know that the companies which make the sensors and other components have been pushing their goods for years before that.
Technology trends have long and sometimes painful gestation periods. And then they crawl before they can walk. But then they begin to run.
This figures. Smart watches? A brand new hot trend? No, these things take time.
Tuesday, May 06, 2014
I understand. People do love big numbers and fat CAGRs. Bar charts that look like mountains growing to the heavens. Line graphs with arrows at positive 45° angles. Up is always better than down. Steep is better than flat. The bigger the figures the better the funding.
I was recently churning some numbers with my colleague, creating forecasts for several market research studies we will be publishing at Research Capsule. Growth rates were coming in at nice, respectable levels. 17%, 25%, 40%. But then we compared these to some other market projections. 100%, 150, 200. Such numbers do make great headlines. But could lead to some bad business decisions.
Are optimistic forecasters more likely to be invited to the party? Yes they are. Executives will pay a premium for what are likely exaggerations. I've come across my share of embellished projections. I now see that "trillion" has become the new billion when it comes to dollar figures. There will be many "next trillion dollar industries."
Everybody likes an optimist. This is the flaw of large numbers.
When it comes to market forecasting, it usually pays to be full of it:
Friday, May 02, 2014
Xiaomi the money. Is the smartphone profit margin a thing of the past? Where will the money come from now?
It's a bit sad to see the company where I worked for 16 years break apart. The Nokia I knew no longer exists. But there really are no surprises here. Clever companies know when it's time to move on.
All industries are special, sexy, and exciting. Until the day they aren't. Toasters, refrigerators, transistor radios, televisions, VCRs. They all had their day in the sun, but got covered in a thin, dull layer of boring. They became very everyday objects. Key players come, and key players go.
So, how much have the players in the handset industry changed? Completely! As I've pointed out before, not one single top-ten vendor from 20 years ago is still in the global handset business. They haven't just lost market share, they have given up competing in the industry. The big, fat hardware profits dried up so they just got up and moved on. Let someone else fight for the table scraps. That's the smart move so long as you have another watering hole lined up. (I'll say that the chunk of Motorola owned by Lenovo is a different company than the Motorola we knew.)
I remember five years ago when I first came across a top-ten global handset vendor named Xiaomi. Who? Some company few of us had ever heard of (and few knew how to pronounce) suddenly appeared as a top handset maker. I checked out their website. They had a portfolio of handsets a mile wide with features that must have been stuffed into devices with a plunger. There were phones with televisions, radios, touch input. There were sliders and colors galore. So what is Xiaomi up to now. Well, they are becoming a serious global smartphone company with sharp-looking gadgets. They even make bionic bunny rabbits.
But hey, it's getting crowded in here. Check out Huawei, another company name people can't quite pronounce, but matters a ton nonetheless. Huawei's goal this year is to ship 80 million smartphones. That would give them around 8% global share. And Huawei means business with a $300 million global marketing campaign.
So, what happens when Google brings out the advanced $100 smartphone? And Motorola/Lenovo the sub-$50 smartphone? What happens when good phones reach bubblegum-machine pricing?
How can you compete? No, it's not easy beating Mi. (http://www.mi.com/en)
Is handset (hardware) profitability toast? Key players get burnt once an industry is no longer special.
Tuesday, February 11, 2014
The Internet of Spin. 6LoWPAN might soon be used in billions and billions of things. Couldn't it have a better name?
Bluetooth, a name so odd it sticks.
Wi-Fi, it's a clever play on HiFi.
ZigBee, a bee dance. So cute, how can you resist?
There's 3G. And 4G:
Generic names indicating fast mobility.
And then there's 6LoWPAN. Huh?
It's one of the biggest general trends. The internet of things. Smart objects. The connected home. M2M. Call it whatever. Just don't all it 6LoWPAN. (Meaning IPv6 over Low Power Personal Area Network.)
Yup, all things are getting connected. Locks and lights. Meters and motors. TVs and thermostats. And how will they connect? Well, the battle is on. It's easy enough to count more than a dozen competing technologies. The market will be so big, that there will certainly be room for several of them. But one will take the lead, and I'm leaning towards 6LoWPAN. Maybe.
6LoWPAN is an IETF spec defining how IPv6 packets are to be sent on top of IEEE 802.15.4. It has the potential to be one of the most implemented technologies in history. The spec has its support groups such as IPSO Alliance, and also ETSI. There are huge companies with amazing clout behind 6LoWPAN. Google. IBM. Oracle.
It has so much going for it. But it's name isn't one of them.
To the best of my knowledge, 6LoWPAN doesn't have a better brand name for itself, although there are companies that have their flavors of 6LoWPAN with their own titles. If I'm missing something here, I'd love to know about it. But I think that 6LoWPAN is suffering from an identity crisis. And potentially fragmentation.
(I sort of suspect that someone will correct me on this. And that's one of the goals of this blog entry.)
Does 6LoWPAN need a hero to give the spec unity and identity? Yes it does:
Harald Blåtand, King of Denmark.
Friday, January 31, 2014
More Minolta Moments. Which handset vendor will leave the hardware business next? Here I venture to guess.
What's a Minolta Moment? Well, ask most people these days what Minolta makes and they'll tell you "cameras." Good, Japanese-quality cameras. But they don't. Minolta hasn't made cameras in almost 10 years. Back in 2006 Konica Minolta announced that their market share was too slim, as were the profit margins in the camera biz, to stay in the market. They packed up and left. Konica Minolta doesn't make cameras any longer. They make copy machines and other office equipment. They are an enterprise company.
The handset business has been full of Minolta Moments during the past two decades. For fun, let's look twenty years back at the world's top-ten handset vendors of 1994 and see which are still making phones. (When a mother company sells off the brand, that means they got out of the business in my opinion.) In 1994, Motorola was the dominant global player. But Motorola's mother ship got out of the business. (As did Google.) Nokia doesn't make handsets any longer. Ericsson doesn't. NEC really doesn't. Panasonic barely does. Siemens got out. Philips did. Oki. Toshiba. Mitsubishi.
So, these handset vendors in 1994 had a combined global market share of around 90%. And today? To be honest, I'm not quite sure. The number is so small, it's difficult to figure out. The combined share is likely less than 1% now that Nokia phones are Microsoft phones, and Motorola phones are Google phones soon to be Lenovo phones, just as Alcatel phones have nothing to do with Alcatel. To put this in perspective, imagine for a second the combined automotive market shares of GM, Ford, Toyota, VW, Nissan, Renault, Honda, Fiat, Mazda, and Hyundai dropped to 1% over a period of a decade or two. That's how much the handset market has changed.
So, now it's time for some conjecture. It's time to ask who's next. Where will the future handset Minolta Moments come from? Well, BlackBerry is a goner as far as I'm concerned. They're getting ready for a perfect Minolta Moment. Ready to concentrate on soft enterprise solutions. Then there's LG. Sure, LG is still a top-ten handset vendor, but they're a long way off from where they want to be. (I'm guessing Sony will stay the course, trying to leverage their sub-brands and content.)
The semi-surprise will be when Microsoft announces their handset Minolta Moment. Perhaps such a second-hand Minolta Moment can be called a "Google Shift:" At some point in time, Microsoft will sell off the Nokia brand they have access to, likely to an Asian vendor. (Nokia is still a great brand name in many Asian countries.) They'll sell off the factories they bought. Some of the patents they have access to. Offices and chairs and pencils and market channels. Microsoft press releases will call it a strategic move allowing Microsoft to concentrate on creating amazing mobile software while working with a fantastic hardware partner. Or something like that. Yep, the platitudes will pour out, bloggers will have a field day, Microsoft's stock will shoot up 3% seconds after the announcement as they also announce plans to close their sad-looking, empty retail stores.
I have to say, for the handset business, it's been a rather ugly picture for legacy vendors.
Strange. Minolta doesn't make cameras. And Nokia doesn't make phones.
Sunday, January 26, 2014
Color movies, color television, color computer monitors, color-screened handsets. So, what's next? This trend is so obvious, it practically lights itself.
Before... and after.
Monday, January 20, 2014
Not many phones have infrared these days (although there are some), so using a phone as a remote for most existing boxes isn't so straight forward. But smartphones do have WiFi and Bluetooth, meaning it's possible to at least indirectly communicate with televisions and set-top boxes. But despite promised of Bluetooth-enabled STB's, it's looking likely that ZigBee could be the wireless standard for such things going forward.
But, to the best of my knowledge, there are no mainstream smartphones or tablets with built in ZigBee support, although there are rumors that Samsung and HTC will be introducing ZibBee-enabled devices soon. If such devices hit the market, it would mean that smartphones could be used to directly control such things as ZibBee enabled set-top boxes, locks, and light bulbs without the need for a gateway. (Even Nest's Learning Thermostat is ZigBee-enabled, meaning it could become part of the home's ZigBee mesh network, and potentially act as a ZibBee-to-WiFi gateway.)
So, it's interesting to note the increased interest in the relatively new category of the smart home phone, a smart device dedicated to being the remote control for all things in the home. Television & temperature. Lighting and laundry. The concept has been around for years and has been addressed in piecemeal ways so far. But now the pieces are really coming together.
So, who'll be in control? Device vendors, cable operators, security companies, energy companies, Google? Get ready for the rush toward remote opportunities.
There could be possibilities in remotes.
Thursday, January 16, 2014
There are 12 billion bulbs sold each year worldwide. The majority are still incandescent bulbs -- the kind guys like Edison invented. Nominally one of the biggest market shifts ever will take place during the coming decade.
The key technology enablers such as chipsets have been out on the market for a few years now. And now the products are following the components to market.
Research Capsule's five forecast coming out soon...
Key enabler from NXP for IP connectivity.
Wednesday, January 15, 2014
Home game. The battle for the home heats up with Google's Nest purchase, after selling its set-top box unit.
Google's $3.2 billion purchase of Nest Labs was interesting but for me, raises questions about the potential of the television set-top box as a gateway for the home.
I say this because when Google purchased Motorola Mobility back in 2012, in addition to the handset unit, they also got the set-top box division as part of the package deal. Motorola's set-top box unit is the world's second largest STB vendor and has an installed user base of tens of millions. As cable operators are looking to the set-top box as a springboard to offer more services for the home, hardware vendors are adding WiFi and ZigBee making them part of the home network, and for many, a thing of the internet. But last year Google sold off Motorola's Set-Top Box unit To Arris For $2.6 billion.
Nest is reporting some very impressive volumes, with more than one million Nest thermostats sold already. That's a very impressive number for the startup, and does put Google into the homes of many innovative users. And of course it does provide Google with some fantastic talent. But why on earth did Google sell off the set-top box unit that was in many
Having some experience from the set-top box industry, I know that cable and satellite operators can be rather protective of their walled gardens, and understandably so. But this does hurt innovation. And given the significant potential conflicts of interest between operators and Google (YouTube, Google TV,...), Google was looking for a more forward-looking way into the home.
Google gave up a fantastic footprint in the home for some good reasons. I assume Google has no seller's regret getting rid of the unit. They came to the conclusion that the set-top box business wasn't the best way through the front door. Rather, now they're looking to bring combine an Apple-esque hardware experience with their vision of the internet of things.
Tuesday, January 14, 2014
From B to Z, wireless standards can be so confusing you see.
"The nice thing about standards is that you have so many to choose from." That's a great quote from computer scientist Andrew Tanenbaum.
Like sausages and laws, you should never watch standards being made. It can be a messy process. And very competitive. There's the pure technical work. And then there's the lobbying. And the backroom deals. And the temporary alliances. There are the IPR battles and legal battles. And then there's the time required for the market to settle things.
I've been looking at the market for smart bulbs lately. The day will come when even our light bulbs are part of our personal connected networks. A bit Rube Goldberg-esque perhaps. A solution looking for a bigger problem to solve, but cool stuff nonetheless. There really are lots of cool use cases with connected, colored lighting.
But one thing that's confusing me is all the air interface standards being used in these bulbs. And I follow standards pretty closely. Could you imagine how the average consumer will feel? Interoperability? That's for the other vendor to worry about.
So, connected bulbs are hitting the market now. And lots more will during 2014. Let's see what technologies vendors are using to make the wireless connections into the home network: some use ZigBee and and some use Z-Wave. Some are planning on (low power) WiFi and one uses Bluetooth. There's something called 6LowPAN (IPv6 over Low power Wireless Personal Area Networks) and then, of course, there are several proprietary interfaces.
As we enter the age of the smart home and the internet of things, this is no small matter. Either things will work smoothly together, or they won't. For now it's looking like ZigBee with its many specific use-case specific protocols is looking like it might pull ahead. Set-top box vendors together with their cable operator partners are looking at ZigBee for cable boxes and remote controls. And at least two handset vendors might soon include ZigBee directly in their smartphones. And the most popular smart bulb and the most popular connected thermostat use ZigBee. But now I read that most new PAN implementations will be using Z-Wave. And some love IETF's 6LowPAN. Of course Bluetooth and WiFi have their installed user-base advantages. And I could list more here.
So, which PAN spec do you like best? Pick and choose. You just can't lose.